Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Going Paperless


There is this new fad in this day and age about going “paperless.” That is, we save everything to electronic data sources; flash drives, disk drives, and diskettes. But, even though there are so many benefits of doing so, the possible disadvantages loom ahead.

Disadvantage Theory One: Electromagnetic Pulses (EMPs)
Our nation has already used technologies such as EMPs (pronounced Eee-Em-Pee, not emph). They are used to knock out electronics in a certain radius. But, say another country developed an EMP powerful enough to wipe data clean off of a source? And what if that same country dropped such an EMP on multiple server sites that contain all of the data that lies within the now-internet-only-version of Encyclopedia Britannica? Well, crap.

Disadvantage Theory Two: Space Impact
What would happen if a giant space rock or meteor knocked out a data center? Well, instead of getting those photos and documents back, take a space rock. Go post a picture on Instagram, or whatever.

Disadvantage Theory Three: Finite Resources
As far as I can remember, metal is a finite resource. It does not grow. It does not magically appear under your pillow. It does not hide in the closet. So, inevitably, if we are to continue to create more hard drives and diskettes to hold all of this data, and create more and more computers to access this data…won’t we run out of metal to create new computers at some (very distant) time?

Huh. Maybe, since trees grow back, using paper is a better idea.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Why Kids Bring Guns To School (and a side of potatoes)


Well, I seem to have taken a ridiculously long sabbatical from writing blogs. My apologies if you have been waiting for one. If you didn’t really care, that’s fine too.
Anyways, today’s topic: things that you probably didn’t care about. Let me (barely) amuse you by starting off with a little segment about…flavored medicine.

Flavored Medicine.
Ask your parents about medicine. Go ahead. What did it taste like? Most likely, their description of the taste would be along the lines of “It was disgusting” or something like that. Well, too bad for them, right? They were forced to digest this revolting syrup (cod liver oil, perhaps).
But, this was a good thing. The medicine tasted terrible, thus was an incentive to not want to ingest medicine. Nowadays, medicine tastes good. Since this is the case, young children want to have more of it because they like the artificial flavoring. Next thing you know, the child is in the medicine cabinet, figuring out how to remove the “childproof cap” and downing a whole bottle of grape-flavored Tylenol. Wonderful.
Speaking of children, why not move onto a more interesting topic; kids fighting in school?

Kids get punished for fighting.
In most public schools nowadays, teachers and principals are making a move against violence in school. They are trying to reduce the amount of violence by, in essence, teaching children of the various ways to be punished for having your fist meet another kid’s face. Detentions, suspensions; basically isolating the child from the rest of the school as a punishment. And, should a teacher not be aware of a fight or conflict, a student who has seen the dispute is to report the incident to the teacher. Because, as we all know, running to a teacher always makes you the hero and fixes everything.
Let me create a scenario. Imagine we have three people in a classic school hallway; a teacher, and two middle-schoolers. Say one of the middle schoolers is a big, burly, bully-type of guy who is having a bad day. The other kid is your classic nerd; weak, helpless, focuses mainly on bringing back good grades to his parents and staying out of trouble.
Big bully (let’s call him Billy for good alliteration) is storming down the hall. Nerd kid is busy putting his belongings in his locker. The teacher walks into her classroom. Billy grabs the nerd by the shoulders, whirls him around, and shoves him towards the wall, hard. Nerd kid’s books fly everywhere, and he slumps to the floor opposite his locker. Billy then walks away.
What should nerd kid do? This has been happening every day for the past two weeks. Should he go and tell the teacher, and risk being called out by his peers as a wuss? Or should he keep it to himself, knowing yet that the same event will happen the next day? Well, nerd kid doesn’t want to ever risk being called out as a wuss. That would be his end; he would be shunned by his peers. So, he keeps it to himself.
This continues for another week. At the end of the week, nerd kid can’t take it anymore and slaps Billy in the face as he approaches on his normal routine. Billy notices a teacher nearby, and fakes extreme pain to get revenge on nerd kid. The teacher is unaware of Billy being a bully. The teacher immediately refers nerd kid to the principal, where he receives an in-school suspension for three days the following week.
I may have not clearly conveyed my point, but this is the gist of what I am trying to get across: bullies attack students, students keep quiet for a while, then the student retaliates, but the student, not the bully, receives punishment. This happens because the student is initially scared of retaliating, but in the end doesn’t really give a damn. And, there is a worse ending to this than what was previously described. That ending can be compared to events such as the Columbine Shootings: kids were picked on until their fuse finally burned out, then went berserk with weaponry, seeking revenge, trying to convey “who’s the boss of me now?”
Now, what if we allowed kids to fight in school? What if we tolerated bullies? I can draw a picture. A bully would go up to a kid and throw him down, but then that kid might get back up and throw a punch, then some of each side’s friends would come to aid, and within a couple hours, peace would be restored, truces created, and everyone could go back to their normal habits. Summary? Don’t have teacher intervention. Let things play out the way they are supposed to be. Then, from strife, peace will arise. Because in the end, having more violence leads to less violence…
…does that even make sense?

(My apologies if I don’t make any sense. Carry on.)